More Than 5555 Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

SO YOU CAN HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS AND DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW ANY STINKING LAWS.



PHOTO CREDIT HERE.

Today my side bar counter reads "Today Islamic Terrorists Have Carried Out More than 5555 Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11." If that doesn't convince you that negotiating with radical islamists is not an option, what would?

Also today Britain's Home Secretary refused to name the enemies by their common religious affiliation. Other British officials had strong words against President Bush for stating yesterday in a speech about the incident that we are at war with islamic fascists. No basic assumptions can be drawn about those responsible for the thwarted plot to blow up 10 human-filled commercial planes mid-air and the other 5555 islamic terrorist attacks since 9/11? Denial has its drawbacks.

We can't win--survive--against an enemy we deny exists. If we want to see ourselves as "nice" "open minded" "inclusive" "better than that..." people, some of our so-called civil "rights" are going to have to be violated in order to protect us from extinction.

You see, it either has to be that we name our enemy and allow all "civil rights" to continue for everyone except members of the acknowledged enemy group. Or, it has to be that we do not name our enemy by any identity and we have to treat everyone exactly the same--with suspicion--discovering the individual enemies one by one through the strict enforcement of all laws on the books. No whining about discrimination anymore. No bleeding heart activist judges. The same treatment for you and me as for any islamo fascist.

NOTE TO SELF: THIS IS A MENTAL HEAD SLAP MOMENT.

Instead, we want to have it both ways: ("We're just trying to make a living for ourselves and our families--we don't need no stinking laws.") No laws enforced, and no identification of those who will do the general public harm--or annihilation--for, in this case, radical religious reasons. That's what I call a lose/lose situation.